• Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Michael Moore fans vs. Rush Limbaugh fans: Who Really Practices What They Preach?

More than 31,000 Hunch users have answered the following Teach Hunch About You (THAY) question on Hunch.com:

Moore and Limbaugh are prominent firebrands of the American left and right, respectively, and each has a very large audience.  We wondered: Do the respective supporters of polar-opposite thought leaders behave differently in terms of their moral and ethical choices?

To get some answers, we dug into Hunch’s THAY (Teach Hunch About You) database of 2,000 questions and more than 80 million responses.  For the purposes of this analysis we’ll compare Moore, representing the farther left side of the spectrum and Rush Limbaugh, representing the right. (Note that we found that Jon Stewart fans often answer THAY questions somewhere in the middle of how Moore and Limbaugh fans do.)

Here’s what we found:

1) Limbaugh fans are less empathetic than Moore fans.

To start: Moore fans are 20% more likely to say it’s better to be “sympathetic rather than “fair-minded.” This might explain why Michael Moore fans are also 27% more likely to “lie to authorities to cover for a family member or loved one”.

The groups obviously differ on various political opinions, which are in part informed by moral differences:

Thus, we can say conclude that the views of both groups differ on right and wrong. This is a rather predictable result. Given the global warming skepticism of the Limbaugh fans, for example, it makes sense that they are six times less likely to see climate change as their most serious concern. Yet to what extent, if no one is watching, do these groups follow their principles? This leads us to our next discovery:

2) Michael Moore fans are bigger Hypocrites

In one example, Moore fans were 40% more likely to say they’d “cheat on a significant other if there were no chance of being caught.”

  • Yet this isn’t because Moore fans think cheating is okay, as they are 71% less likely to always forgive a significant other for cheating on them.

From these questions we can see Moore fans generally think cheating is bad, especially when done to them, but are far more likely to do it if they didn’t think they’d get caught. There seems to be a general pattern emerging here:

One thing to consider is whether both groups are being equally truthful in their responses to these questions. It is possible that rather than being more hyppocritical, Moore fans are just more honest. The data we have presented can be interpreted in many ways.

3) Moore fans give less moral weight to corporations

Although both Moore and Limbaugh fans are unlikely to see theft as good, Moore fans are far more likely to justify it when dealing with a corporate entity, or are in a situation where they don’t fear getting caught:

Not only are Moore fans more reluctant to afford companies moral weight, they also feel that the behavior or personality of another person can justify doing wrong against them:

  • 60% of Moore fans would report finding an amount of more than $50 on the street to authorities, yet if a “jerk” drops a $20 bill but doesn’t notice, 49% of Moore fans wouldn’t alert the person or return their money. This group is less likely to return money to someone they have just seen physically drop it than to an anonymous person if they think the former is a “jerk.”
  • Limbaugh fans by comparison are 50% more likely to report a found $50, and 63% would return a jerk’s dropped money. Thus Limbaugh fans seem more willing to treat both corporate entities and persons they dislike with equal moral consideration.

These results paint a consistent picture of Moore fans having principles that they seem far more likely to violate. This raises the question: Are such actions taken against the respondent’s better judgment, or do the respondents actually believe their actions to be justified, despite inconsistencies in their responses? It seems that Moore fans are far more likely to justify actions they consider bad by claiming the action’s recipient is somehow less moral than they (as in the jerk example) or simply not worry about it if they don’t think they’d get caught.

4) Finally, both groups are highly politically-engaged, though Moore fans prefer to work outside the system

And don’t forget what we found earlier in our earlier Hunch report Voting in an Echo Chamber: The Myth of the “Informed” Vote, which established that people seek out media which supports their preexisting views.

What have we learned?

  • Neither group of fans is morally perfect.  For example, a majority of fans in both groups say it’s ok to steal office suppliers and indicate that they’ve cheated on tests in high school or college.
  • While Michael Moore’s philosophy and films reflect prevailing themes of fairness, social well being, and getting involved to help each other, the data above suggests that many of their moral and ethical choices are actually for their own benefit, sometimes even at the expense of other individuals.
  • Moore fans generally favor policies which give them the ability to act as they wish; Limbaugh fans tend to support policies which are “fair” and within the law.
  • Michael Moore fans show a consistently greater tendency than Limbaugh fans towards participating in (or accepting) behavior which is currently illegal.

What do you think?  Keep it civil, please…

  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Facebook
  • Twitter